A PLACE TO BE
Sunday, December 6, 2015
VOTE
The Cowen Ratification Packet was approved during a special meeting last Wednesday. To end this Cowen lawsuit the Board will require that a minimum of 513 unit owners must cast a vote (51%) and that a minimum of 75% of the total votes must be FOR the Cowen easement.
I feel it’s time to set grievances aside and accept the only choice left that makes the most sense.
Owners would be smart to vote yes even if they disagree with the easement. It is by far the lesser of two evils money wise. It puts in place solidified future easement regulations towards Cowen's use of our common element road and utilities costs . As slow as things happen here in our little paradise one can confidently add that these costs should not happen within our lifetime.
So the bottom line is this, vote yes so you as an owner won't have a pay a future assessment of over $2000 and let’s spend future time on our bigger problems.
Packets can be picked up at the Rec. Hall this Wed. morning on the (9th) or receive it in the mail.
COMMENTS
Packets can be picked up at the Rec. Hall this Wed. morning on the (9th) or receive it in the mail.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Hi All, I firmly believe that a YES vote is the correct vote for us now and in the future. For to long, we have squabbled, it is time we work together to put this issue firmly behind us. We are a community, let's work in unison to get this vote done. Please, get your vote turned in and counted, VOTE YES for our community.
Marc, can you at least explain your position?
Is Friedman voting? YES (Cowen sue both, same suit)
Flsh News: Cowen has perfect and EXSISTING (Today) access thru his land?
Also I find it funny that some of Letters pushing hard for people to say YES have NO Signature...? such as the one one of the Director's posted in the activity center window showcase... fishy fishy
Where is the letter were the JUDGE is urging US to settle? (never hear of a Judge asking plaintiffs directly anything...what?)
People talking to Directors:
Record and document every single word that comes out of their mouths privately and in meetings, save any and all documents given to you (Signed or not), the disclaimer that frees them from any liability is totally unethical abusive and unconstitutional (told to us by a real lawyer).
is LIV asking our previous lawyer to refund the fees he collected for years for his ill advice?
Praying and agreeing with a comment posted a few days ago soon we get some NEW capable schooled Directors with business experience! that are not conducting ANY busine$$ in the park nor have a personal a agenda as noted by many....
In support of my previous comment of 12/22 I would follow up first with a bit of background. I have only been an owner for about 2 years but prior to that I was a year round renter for about 4 years, during that time I came to realize that there is more squabbling, gossiping and griping than between the national political parties leading up to an election. In both cases this is carried on by what is ostensibly our wisest, most life experienced and knowledgeable members of society, its senior members.
In response to a previous comment, (even though this case is in State Court) I have had occasion to work with and for the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Judges have and do make suggestions to the various parties to a legal action, as to what they (the Judge) feels is a possible solution or consequence to actions taken by the parties in a proceeding. The judge can remind the parties what his judgement (action) must be, by law, should the parties not reach an agreement.
Please understand that I am neither supporting the previous actions of the BOD or its representatives/Agents, nor am I supporting MR. Cowen's, my thoughts are only for what I perceive, (in my humble opinion) may be best for the future of our community as a whole.
The only winners here are the Lawyers.
This horse has been kicked around, beaten on, cussed and discussed, forgotten, revived and expended for about 7 years near as I can tell. All of that has got us to this point where we have an opportunity to bury this horse, stop the bickering and the costs, both fiscal and physical, to our community.
We have many other issues to address, together, for the betterment of our village. Let us put this one behind us while we have the chance.
Thank You Marc for your honest and decent response/opinion and Joe for keeping the blog going...
On the Cowan suit: We still seating in the fence undecided on how to vote...
Hard to imagine having construction or even 18 wheelers coming and going thru the main road or even the swing bridge (not now not ever, even if starts in 1 or 2 years) in our opinion that will revert LIV to a Trailer Park...
Has anybody consider the effect this will have in property valuations? as it is it seems daily there is new properties for sale... border line stampede.
Who is Aramark New Gral (for the most part "Absent" manager) responding to?
I think either should be only the President or in the alternative always with a minimum of 2 Directors, and NOT a single Director trying to manipulate him as the same OLD group is salivating to take control of the board again. (haven't you done enough damage? are you proud of LIV State of affairs?)
One more thing (before paying) any assessments: where can we see the contract that has been signed with the dredging company? remember the Judge ordered 6.5 feet in depth ALL around as sated in the bylaws.
Post a Comment