A PLACE TO BE

A PLACE TO BE

Sunday, February 26, 2012

The Rental Office

Three times over the past decade the Board has made decisions not to close the Rental Office. The first time they made one condition for staying open, it cannot cost the Association money. Well we all know that didn’t happen since Association members now are subsidizing around $30,000 annually so those few who rent through the Rental Office can make a lot of money.
We’ve been told twice we now can’t afford to close the Rental Office because office figures show the losses would more than double each year.
So being a simple man help me out here, surely I'm missing something. Could it be the answer was given at our February board meeting?
After President Montalvo expressed his frustration with Aramark on acquiring flow charts, Director Sandberg added similar ones and believes that in keeping two set of books, one for LIV and one for Aramark, it becomes a total nightmare to get an answer on even the simplest of things like how much did we spend on Verizon last year.
She couldn’t believe the paper trail that Aramark requires an Association bill to travel. For instance, Verizon sends their bill to the Welcome Center. The office manager opens it up and gives it to the GM for approval. The GM sends it back to the office manager so she can enter it into Aramark’s system and you would think that should be it, right, cut the check and mail it, right? Not so fast, after it's been entered into Aramark’s system the bill now travels to the Aramark people in Pennsylvania where they purge it for processing in order to make a check out to pay the Verizon bill in our behalf. So now we’re done, right? Wrong, a month later the Pennsylvania people will have to send our office a statement requesting a reimbursement for their efforts and our office now has to go back through their set of records to reconcile Aramark’s numbers. When this is all said and done, the office will show in Aramark’s system that the reconciliation has taken place and our office can now make a check to pay Aramark.
In short what normally takes any other office five minutes to pay a simple phone bill, our office takes an hour and the Association has to pay that employee for that time. To do all the items that flow through the office this cumbersome way it would not surprise me that Aramark has required the need of more office employees. Take as many guesses as you want as to who would pay for that and while you're guessing, who has to pay for the services of the people in Pennsylvania? Even President Montalvo said after reviewing his cash flow reports that he feels our Village is paying Aramark $110,000 a year for the most part to pay our bills, little else.
So one might find it interesting if this may have everything to do with losing $70,000 per year if the Rental Office were to close. Is it time for our Association to wake up to Aramark.
Your comment

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I drop to my knees and sing praises to the LORD.... What do you think we have been trying to tell you.. Just a few really listen.. I am sobbing right now.. PLEASE CONTINUE!

OH yes I had sent a list of loal companieswho do the same work for a fraction of the cost!

Anonymous said...

We don't need a management company, just some managers with authority and direction.

Anonymous said...

Can you imagine any of the last several boards coming to a coherent decision on anything by themselves?
What a mess. I have no love for Aramark, we never got an explaination on LD and Les and why were we not cmpensated for all the crap they pulled.

But on the other hand we have the Mcrentals who are proving that they have no ethics.MS who was part of the LD and Les's back-up crew. They lied and she swore to it.

What a mess...

Anonymous said...

All I have heard since I owned property in LIV is how ARAMARK is the ONLY such company who can handle our rental office as well as the restaurant. A couple of years ago we finally did enough research to uncover other such companies. ARAMARK has proven that they CANNOT manage either appropriately. So it begs the questions... Can we find another who will manage ALL of LIV and bring us into the "black". Or do we close the rental office and the restaurant and find a replacement management company who possibly will not cost us as much (due to the lower expectations) but run everything else appropriately. Either way, IT IS TIME TO LOOK LONG AND HARD AT WHAT ARAMARK IS "BRINGING TO THE TABLE".

Anonymous said...

The rental office as well as the grill can't make money it does not matter who operates them!!
Why can't owners at LIV understand that?
We have dozens of restaurants within a very short drive that offer the same quality and better food and service and they are failing.
It's the same with the ice machine by the security gate. Totally stupid idea, a money loser but one that an Aramark manager would like.
The rental office is run by non professionals. And it is a mess. Why would we expect that in the worst economy in decades non professionals could manage a fragmented office. But more importantly why, as with the Grill, would we want our own office when we have so many qualified rental companies that could be held to a standard by our board.
Add volunteer water saver classes and install water savers at all LIV baths ect.
Crack down on over ocupying rental houses in the summer.
The BOD needs an ethicial code of conduct.

The Holy Crapper said...

HOLY CRAP! How can closing the rental office possibly cause the rental office losses to "more than double"? It should completely eliminate the rental office losses! How can a rental office incur financial losses if it ceases to exist??