Our Village

Saturday, October 24, 2015

SHAME !

Last Wednesday we had over forty Long Island Village owners take time out of their lives to attend a Coffee Meeting,. These meetings are non-official and are deemed an owner’s forum where concerns are voiced and questions are asked. Last Wednesday we had five Directors use this forum to distastefully put on a show and seemingly ignore the meeting's purpose.

DREDGING TIDBIT

It’s almost certain the canal dredging would have been done by now if not for Mr. Freeland’s insurance requirements for the spoils. But now this delay turns out peachy because at July’s Coffee we heard Directors

WHICH MIGHT IT BE, L.I.V. or ASSESSMENT CITY?

THE “NO MONEY BLUES”
With 2015 expected budget revenues at well over $3.6 million, one might wonder why some Directors are singing the “no money blues”? Is the ditty over knowing there's a near empty Infrastructure Fund which now needs somewhere north of $2 million or is this melody all about that parking lot restoration which went $90,000 over budget and strangled the

YOUR COMMENT OR SUGGESTION?

STRIPES ARE HERE!

Owners have waited over 300 days for a $300,000 parking lot that was originally approved for $198.000. Who knows if over another $100,000 was lost in the revenue areas because of this?
No doubt we need to get much smarter in dealing with the upcoming Cowen lawsuit decision and infrastructure needs. Wouldn't you as an owner agree?
Comments

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

THE 4 MONTH RUSH FOR ONE, ULTIMATUM 4 THE OTHER

Pick your poison when deciding whether to go to trial or resolve the Cowen lawsuit because most would agree the one that gets picked will have a profound impact on our Village. We know the Village attorney and most on our Board have expressed the need for the resolution, but want the membership involved. With that being said, where’s the problem?

Read more...

THINGS NOTICED AT THE MAY 20th SPECIAL MEETING

Since the court left both parties till the end of the year to either resolve the Cowen lawsuit or go to trial, those in charge said this involves the member’s property so it is the member’s decision. Members have never witnessed such an attitude when